Legislature(2003 - 2004)
2004-05-08 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2004-05-08 House Journal Page 4015 SB 272 The following, which was advanced to third reading from the May 7, 2004, calendar (page 3964), was read the third time: CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 272(FIN) am H "An Act relating to certain monetary advances in which the deposit or other negotiation of checks to pay the advances is delayed until a later date; and providing for an effective date." 2004-05-08 House Journal Page 4016 Representative Anderson placed a call of the House. The Speaker stated the call was satisfied. The question being: "Shall CSSB 272(FIN) am H pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 272(FIN) am H Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 25 NAYS: 13 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Anderson, Chenault, Coghill, Dahlstrom, Fate, Foster, Gatto, Harris, Hawker, Heinze, Kott, Lynn, Masek, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Ogg, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stepovich, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Wilson, Wolf Nays: Berkowitz, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kohring, Moses, Williams Excused: Holm, Kookesh And so, CSSB 272(FIN) am H passed the House. Representative Coghill moved the effective date clause. Representative Berkowitz objected. Representative Berkowitz moved and asked unanimous consent that the question be divided. The Speaker ruled the question was divisible. There being no objection, the question of the effective date clauses was divided. Representative Coghill moved the effective date clause in Section 7. The question being: "Shall the effective date clause in Section 7 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 272(FIN) am H Third Reading Effective Date in Section 7 YEAS: 28 NAYS: 10 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 2004-05-08 House Journal Page 4017 Yeas: Anderson, Chenault, Coghill, Croft, Dahlstrom, Fate, Foster, Gatto, Harris, Hawker, Heinze, Kohring, Kott, Lynn, Masek, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Ogg, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stepovich, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Williams, Wilson, Wolf Nays: Berkowitz, Cissna, Crawford, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Moses Excused: Holm, Kookesh And so, the effective date clause in Section 7 was adopted. Representative Coghill moved the effective date clause in Section 8. The question being: "Shall the effective date clause in Section 8 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 272(FIN) am H Third Reading Effective Date in Section 8 YEAS: 35 NAYS: 3 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Anderson, Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Croft, Dahlstrom, Fate, Foster, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Heinze, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kohring, Kott, Lynn, Masek, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Ogg, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stepovich, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Williams, Wilson, Wolf Nays: Crawford, Gara, Moses Excused: Holm, Kookesh And so, the effective date clause in Section 8 was adopted. Representative Berkowitz gave notice of reconsideration of the vote on CSSB 272(FIN) am H.